Il Piacere Di Scoprire Feynman Pdf

“Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.”― Richard Feynman, The Pleasure of Finding Things Out'The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.' ― Richard Feynman, The Pleasure of Finding Things OutIt is hard to not love Feynman. You can love his as a scientist, as a man, as a genius, as a teacher, as an icoclass='gr-hostedUserImg'The “Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.”― Richard Feynman, The Pleasure of Finding Things Out'The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.'

― Richard Feynman, The Pleasure of Finding Things OutIt is hard to not love Feynman. You can love his as a scientist, as a man, as a genius, as a teacher, as an iconoclast. He is the real deal.

'The Pleasure of Finding Things Out' is a series of 13 speeches, articles, essays, interviews by or with Richard Feynman. These are guilty pleasure reads for people who adore those great physicists of the early 2oth centuries who were lucky AND brilliant enough to be physicists when physics jumped from classical to quantum. These guys were amazing. Feynman wasn't among the first wave of theoretical physicists to dance in the quantum space, but he was a huge member of the second wave.The thing that makes Feynman so interesting is just his unpretentious quirkiness, his love of telling stories, his ability to quickly grasp the root of a problem (whether in physics, biology, or religion) and give you an honest answer.The only drawback to this collection is it repeats several stories. Feynman retold many of his favorite stories (locks at Los Alamos) or ideas (cargo cult science).

So if you've read or many of these stories have been heard before. Even inside of this book a couple stories get retold a bit. It is unavoidable, but still a bit of a draw back.Anyway, this isn't a deep dive into science.

It is a flirtation with the curiosity that drives scientists. It is the recollections of one of the most fascinating characters to come out of the Manhattan Project and the post-quantum revolution period of physics. So, if you haven't read much on Feynman I might recommend reading 'Surely You're Joking, Mr.

First, but I'd still not neglect to check this out as well. Here's the problem with having high expectations: they're so often dashed.In my years trawling the web and being a science nerd, I've heard a lot about Richard Feynman. There are legends about him, that he was the Puck of physics - brilliant, untamed, and really, really funny. When I got the book, I was expecting to read a lightning-quick volley of ideas that would set my mind alight with the wonder and infinite possibilities continued within a lifetime's pursuit of science.Here's the problem with having high expectations: they're so often dashed.In my years trawling the web and being a science nerd, I've heard a lot about Richard Feynman.

There are legends about him, that he was the Puck of physics - brilliant, untamed, and really, really funny. When I got the book, I was expecting to read a lightning-quick volley of ideas that would set my mind alight with the wonder and infinite possibilities continued within a lifetime's pursuit of science.Yeah, that didn't quite happen.Don't get me wrong - Feynman is indisputably brilliant, and far from the classic mold of the physicist. He had no patience for titles or honors, and in fact couldn't give a damn about them as long as he had science to do. He would tell Nobel laureates - men whose names were bywords for scientific brilliance - that they were wrong, without hedging or worrying about their egos. Free download mp3 converter.

He liked to play the bongos, loved a good party, and delighted in playing tricks. One of his more irritating hobbies was safe-cracking, and by the time he left Los Alamos labs after the Manhattan Project there were no places left to hide secrets from Feynman.So Feynman was no doubt a really cool guy, the kind of scientist you would want to invite to your party without hesitation.

His first interest was science, and as scientist go, he was one of the best.That doesn't mean that reading him is entirely entertaining.The book is, for me, not very readable for two reasons. The first is that it goes get terribly technical at times, and while I love science, I am not educated enough in it to grasp a lot of the technical details. Indeed, it broke my heart when Feynman said that, when it comes to physics, if you don't know the math, you don't know the science.

Humbling, yes. But still.Were I editing a collection of Feynman's work, I would have started with the Big Ideas, defenses of science as an integral function of humanity's ultimate progress. Then, having made the reader comfortable with how Feynman thought, they could have gotten into what Feynman thought.But no, the book starts of with highly technical lectures on quantum electrodynamics and the difficulties in getting parallel computers to work. If you don't know a lot about how computers work, or you don't have a detailed awareness of atomic theory, you're going to be a little lost. Or a lot lost. Even his minority opinion on the Challenger accident, something I was especially keen to read, was far too dry to be enjoyable.The second reason why I didn't really enjoy this book is because a lot of it is transcripts of speeches and interviews.

Very few people are able to speak in a readable manner, and someone with a mind like Feynman's - always moving, always active - isn't one of them. There are a lot of asides and false starts, wandering thoughts and truncated paragraphs. Even his more structured speeches aren't structured very well for the reader. Perhaps it would be different to listen to him, to sit in the audience and watch the man speak. I reckon that he had the kind of infectious energy and enthusiasm that would make it easy to gloss over structural problems and really enjoy the speech. But turning speech into print is always dangerous, and here I think it fails.For different people - people who are deeply involved in physics or who are Feynman acolytes - this book is probably a fascinating look into the mind of one of the 20th century's greatest scientists. For the rest of us, we're going to have to find other things to enjoy from the text, and it is there.

One of those is, indeed, the title of the book - the pleasure of finding things out.For Feynman, science wasn't a rigor or a job, it was a joy. He attributes a lot of that attitude to his father, an unlikely fan of science. As a uniform salesman, Feynman's father was not a scientist and had no scientific training.

But he raised his son to think about the world. Rather than tell him why, for example, a bird picked at its feathers with its beak, encouraged Richard to observe the bird, to form a hypothesis and then see if observations confirmed it.

His father taught him to question everything, to form his own opinions about the world, and by doing so, made him into a scientist from an early age.It is that attitude which should be the dominant theme of this book, rather than Feynman's technical genius. He says, over and over, to doubt everything. Ask yourself why things are the way they are, rather than just relying on what other people tell you. Observe, experiment and test, and you're doing science.He has some disdain for social sciences, and a pretty healthy dose of misogyny in a couple of places, but if he is arrogant, then it is probably deserved.

Feynman was a man fascinated with how the universe worked, all the way down to its smallest components, and that was his passion. Not awards, not titles, not praise - just the work, the discovery and the pleasure.

Whatever your opinion of Feynman, you need to reconcile the fact that he's got unbearably retrograde opinions:'When I was at Cornell, I was rather fascinated by the student body, which seems to me was a dilute mixture of some sensible people in a big mass of dumb people studying home economics, etc, including lots of girls. I used to sit in the cafeteria with the students and eat and try to overhear their conversations and see if there was one intelligent word coming out. You can ima Whatever your opinion of Feynman, you need to reconcile the fact that he's got unbearably retrograde opinions:'When I was at Cornell, I was rather fascinated by the student body, which seems to me was a dilute mixture of some sensible people in a big mass of dumb people studying home economics, etc, including lots of girls. I used to sit in the cafeteria with the students and eat and try to overhear their conversations and see if there was one intelligent word coming out. You can imagine my surprise when I discovered a tremendous thing, it seemed to me.I listened to a conversation between two girls, and one was explaining that if you want to make a straight line, you see, you go over a certain number to the right for each row you go up, that is, if you go over each time the same amount when you go up a row, you make a straight line. A deep principle of analytic geometry!

I was rather amazed. I didn't realize the female mind was capable of understanding analytic geometry.She went on and said, 'Suppose you have another line coming in from the other side and you want to figure out where they are going to intersect.' Suppose on one line you go over two to the right for every one you go up, and the other line goes over three to the right for every one that it goes up, and they start twenty steps apart, etc.-I was flabbergasted. She figured out where the intersection was! It turned out that one girl was explaining to the other how to knit argyle socks.I, therefore, did learn a lesson: The female mind is capable of understanding analytic geometry. Those people who have for ears been insisting (in the face of all obvious evidence to the contrary) that the male and female are equal and capable of rational thought may have something. The difficulty may just be that we have never yet discovered a way to communicate with the female mind.

If it is done in the right way, you may be able to get something out of it.' 175-76, which is somewhat hilariously indexed as 'Geometry')This is pretty ugly even for 1966.Hard to reconcile that this is the same guy who espouses'I don't believe in the idea that there are a few peculiar people capable of understanding math, and the rest of the world is normal. Math is a human discovery, and it's no more complicated than humans can understand' (194) - until you realize when he says people he means men. Feynman is brilliant, arrogant and emotionally cold. He was the youngest brilliant mind working on the atomic bomb in Los Alamos in the 1940's and later won the Nobel Prize in physics. This book is an unintegrated collection of essays, transcripts of speeches, interviews and memoirs.

As such it gets repetitive. We hear three or four times about how his father taught him to observe and we hear three or four times the identical story about the Cargo Cults in New Guinea after WW II. His father, who Feynman is brilliant, arrogant and emotionally cold. He was the youngest brilliant mind working on the atomic bomb in Los Alamos in the 1940's and later won the Nobel Prize in physics. This book is an unintegrated collection of essays, transcripts of speeches, interviews and memoirs.

As such it gets repetitive. We hear three or four times about how his father taught him to observe and we hear three or four times the identical story about the Cargo Cults in New Guinea after WW II. His father, who was not a scientist, turned out to be an excellent teacher specializing in teaching his son to learn by observing. Feynman and his school buddies also had basement 'workshops' so that helped their intellectual development.

It's fun to see a mind at work, punching the envelope, too undisciplined and too powerful to be contained within a skull. This book is a compilation of some of Dr. Feynman's more notable writings and talks from over the years.

I imagine it was a daunting task (even for Feynman himself) to choose which 300 pages of his work to include, given his brilliance and his storied life, but I found the collection here to be an excellent representation of many of the more notable adventures of Feynman's life and some of his more interesting ideas. Of course, only a fraction of his body of work could be included here.This book is a compilation of some of Dr. Feynman's more notable writings and talks from over the years. I imagine it was a daunting task (even for Feynman himself) to choose which 300 pages of his work to include, given his brilliance and his storied life, but I found the collection here to be an excellent representation of many of the more notable adventures of Feynman's life and some of his more interesting ideas. Of course, only a fraction of his body of work could be included here.There is some overlap with other works, mostly with. I didn't find that this detracted from the book, however. This work is fundamentally different in its aim; 'What Do You Care.'

Comes across as a bit of an addendum to Feynman's first biography, and a bit of a stand-alone biography, although particularly focused on a couple of periods of Feynman's life rather than his life as a whole, while this book is first and foremost a collection of notable lectures and writings. For those who might not know, Richard Feynman was a Nobel Prize winning theoretical physicist, canny self-promoter and renowned teacher who worked on the Manhatten Project before he had even finished his Doctoral Thesis. Many books by and about him have been published and he has become a kind of miniature industry since his death; almost anybody who attended one of his lectures and scribbled some notes has tried to get them published, there are biographies and a volume of letters, CDs of impromt For those who might not know, Richard Feynman was a Nobel Prize winning theoretical physicist, canny self-promoter and renowned teacher who worked on the Manhatten Project before he had even finished his Doctoral Thesis.

Richard Feynman is a founder of Quantum Field theory and among the greatest physicists of the 20th century. He is also an interesting and irreverent personality. Reading him is refreshing and his mercurial skepticism is and down to earth style make him fun to read. He covers personal anecdotes like safecracking at Los Alamos, to his report on the space shuttle and some interesting science talks two of which for saw miniturization as the path forward for computers and see a future in what is call Richard Feynman is a founder of Quantum Field theory and among the greatest physicists of the 20th century. He is also an interesting and irreverent personality. Reading him is refreshing and his mercurial skepticism is and down to earth style make him fun to read.

He covers personal anecdotes like safecracking at Los Alamos, to his report on the space shuttle and some interesting science talks two of which for saw miniturization as the path forward for computers and see a future in what is called nanotechnology today. Definitely fun to read this down to earth genius. Richard Feynman is one of my heroes, and this short, very accessible book compiles some of his most engaging writings, as well as a couple of interviews and the report he wrote on the space shuttle Challenger disaster. It's not as biographical as or as technical as, and I think this would be a good place to start for anyone interested in learning about this fascinating man. T Richard Feynman is one of my heroes, and this short, very accessible book compiles some of his most engaging writings, as well as a couple of interviews and the report he wrote on the space shuttle Challenger disaster. It's not as biographical as or as technical as, and I think this would be a good place to start for anyone interested in learning about this fascinating man. This collection highlights throughout Feynman's deeply-held belief that doubt should be at the heart of good science.

It also reveals his quirky, inquisitive character-I particularly love his explanation of how he learned to pick combination locks. For further reading, I also recommend, which is funny and sad at the same time.The Pleasure of Finding Things Out was compiled nearly twenty years ago, and part of the charm is seeing which of Feynman's predictions came true, and where science has gone since the late twentieth century. Overall, though, I like seeing how Feynman thought-and doing a little check to see how well my understanding of science holds up. It is such a pleasure to read Feynman's speeches.

There is a marked difference in the way people talk about something when they enjoy doing the thing and are good at it than when they don't enjoy it very much. That is very noticeable in this book.

Feynman

Feynman has a way of making his sense of wonder and the hunger of understanding things very contagious. The biggest takeaway that a person not involved in the sciences can get from this book is a solid understanding of what is and what is not science. Everyone in search for a truth has its own road, but all roads in never-ending search for the truth eventually lead to physics.

I’ve met Feynman several years ago on mine. Among all other physicist Feynman was the one most distinctively standing out as he was the one who could do the best job of familiarizing the layman with the ways of nature and things hard to grasp intuitively.

I also like Sagan, but I found him more like inspirational guy, Feynman was one with magnificent explanations. A lot Everyone in search for a truth has its own road, but all roads in never-ending search for the truth eventually lead to physics. I’ve met Feynman several years ago on mine. Among all other physicist Feynman was the one most distinctively standing out as he was the one who could do the best job of familiarizing the layman with the ways of nature and things hard to grasp intuitively. I also like Sagan, but I found him more like inspirational guy, Feynman was one with magnificent explanations. A lot of that stuff can be found on youtube, but maybe the most precious fruits of his work I found in.

For anyone wanting to get better understanding of physics and acquiring basics those are invaluable-do-not-miss.This book, although not bad, is not what you would want to get out of him. It will offer you glance at his personality, life and way of thinking but Feynman’s real treasure is in him talking physics. This one can be viewed as desert after getting main dish. Nevertheless I liked it, because it is impossible not to like his genius and personality. Once again he motivated me to go and dive deeper in wonders of universe.

I have always been wary of scientists and scientific literature, because being apparently the 'artsy' type I have been struggling with hard sciences my whole life: I always found them fascinating and scary at the same time and I only managed to make peace with Mathematics a few years ago. Never with Physics or Chemistry, and I always thought people who do them for a living were some kind of aliens. And they are (and so one more fond of science might say about artists), but after reading this boo I have always been wary of scientists and scientific literature, because being apparently the 'artsy' type I have been struggling with hard sciences my whole life: I always found them fascinating and scary at the same time and I only managed to make peace with Mathematics a few years ago. Never with Physics or Chemistry, and I always thought people who do them for a living were some kind of aliens.

And they are (and so one more fond of science might say about artists), but after reading this book I can say that Feynman's way of thinking is simply brilliant, revolutionary and unique. It does not relate pretty much to anything else but his curiosity for what he calls 'the wonders of the world', therefore in its uniqueness it's also not too far away from the artist's point of view. Richard Feynman, a brillant scientific and a bad philospher.-This is what I got when I've read reviews here about that, but I said NO! Not that much, he should have some beautiful views about philosophy and epistemology, just similar to the beauty of his science and stories. But unfortunately he hadn't, and the saddest thing was that he tried to answer methaphysical and religious questions using the scientific empirical method. NO Dr.Feynman, don't do it please!

Richard Feynman, a brillant scientific and a bad philospher.-This is what I got when I've read reviews here about that, but I said NO! Not that much, he should have some beautiful views about philosophy and epistemology, just similar to the beauty of his science and stories. But unfortunately he hadn't, and the saddest thing was that he tried to answer methaphysical and religious questions using the scientific empirical method. NO Dr.Feynman, don't do it please!I will investigate the world without defining it!-Although what I think about his last articles, I've really enjoyed with him his anecdotes, childhood stories, and his justified positions about ' titles, uniforms, prizes,. Yes I've spent a lot of time reading about a man who gave all his life for science, did everything to get the truth, to understand how does the wold ' behave '.Peace on your soul Dr.Feynman, just still trying to follow your steps, to understand. This was my first glimpse into the life and mind of Richard Feynman, and boy was it a ride!

I had some expectations based on some of the stories I heard and his general fame, but the actual Feynman turned to be much deeper and interesting than just those glimpses in popular myths.The Pleasure of Finding Things Out is going to give you just that. Through the speeches and essays in this book you will see the workings of an extraordinary mind and learn much about the process of science This was my first glimpse into the life and mind of Richard Feynman, and boy was it a ride! I had some expectations based on some of the stories I heard and his general fame, but the actual Feynman turned to be much deeper and interesting than just those glimpses in popular myths.The Pleasure of Finding Things Out is going to give you just that. Through the speeches and essays in this book you will see the workings of an extraordinary mind and learn much about the process of science and its place in our world. You will witness historic events, such as the construction of the first atom bomb, meet famous physicists, such as Einstein, Fermi, Bohr, and others, and hear ideas which kickstarted whole fields of science, such as nanotechnology and parallel computing.

And as a side effect, you'll find out one way to raise your kid to be a scientist, and learn a bit about the art of safecracking.All in all, this was a truly inspirational read, and I can't recommend it enough. This book is a bit of a mixed bag. Some of the stories are entertaining, some show a brilliant scientific mind at work, and some provide thought-provoking insights into the role of science in society. Still there is an inelegance to the whole thing.

Most of the pieces are from lectures, talks, and interviews that Feynman gave at one time or another, and while I'm sure he is an engaging speaker, they don't transfer to the page all that well. There are also various repetitions of Feynman's pet ide This book is a bit of a mixed bag. Some of the stories are entertaining, some show a brilliant scientific mind at work, and some provide thought-provoking insights into the role of science in society. Still there is an inelegance to the whole thing. Most of the pieces are from lectures, talks, and interviews that Feynman gave at one time or another, and while I'm sure he is an engaging speaker, they don't transfer to the page all that well. There are also various repetitions of Feynman's pet ideas, which lose a bit of their luster when repeated more than once.

I enjoyed it but not as much as I hoped I would. Richard Phillips Feynman was an American physicist known for the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics, the theory of quantum electrodynamics and the physics of the superfluidity of supercooled liquid helium, as well as work in particle physics (he proposed the parton model).

For his contributions to the development of quantum electrodynamics, Feynman was a joint recipient of the Nobel Pr Richard Phillips Feynman was an American physicist known for the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics, the theory of quantum electrodynamics and the physics of the superfluidity of supercooled liquid helium, as well as work in particle physics (he proposed the parton model). For his contributions to the development of quantum electrodynamics, Feynman was a joint recipient of the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1965, together with Julian Schwinger and Sin-Itiro Tomonaga.

Feynman developed a widely used pictorial representation scheme for the mathematical expressions governing the behavior of subatomic particles, which later became known as Feynman diagrams. During his lifetime and after his death, Feynman became one of the most publicly known scientists in the world.He assisted in the development of the atomic bomb and was a member of the panel that investigated the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster. In addition to his work in theoretical physics, Feynman has been credited with pioneering the field of quantum computing, and introducing the concept of nanotechnology (creation of devices at the molecular scale). He held the Richard Chace Tolman professorship in theoretical physics at Caltech.-wikipediaSee.

“We absolutely must leave room for doubt or there is no progress and there is no learning. There is no learning without having to pose a question. And a question requires doubt. People search for certainty. But there is no certainty. People are terrified — how can you live and not know?

Il Piacere Di Scoprire Feynman Pdf Online

It is not odd at all. You only think you know, as a matter of fact. And most of your actions are based on incomplete knowledge and you really don't know what it is all about, or what the purpose of the world is, or know a great deal of other things.

It is possible to live and not know.”—.

Il Piacere Di Scoprire Feynman Pdf File

Libro Il piacere di scoprire PDF Download. All'indomani del disastro dello Space Shuttle Challenger. Blu Ray Player Mac Serial Number. Feynman Paperback Il piacere di scoprire PDF Download Editore. Richard Feynman was a scientific genius with - in his words - a 'limited intelligence'. This dichotomy is just one of the characteristics that made him a fascinating subject. The Pleasure of Finding Things Out exposes us to many more of these intriguing attributes by featuring an extensive conversation with the acclaimed.What Do You Care What Other People Think?

Feynman Publisher: Blackstone Audiobooks; Unabridged edition (October 15, 2005) Language: English ISBN-10:;; 850.56 MB Narrator: Raymond Todd Mp3/VBR128 kbps Listening Length: 6 hour(s) and 12 min. 7% Recovery One of the greatest physicists of the twentieth century, Richard Feynman possessed an unquenchable thirst for adventure and a great ability to tell the stories of his life.

In one of the book’s many stories we meet his first wife, Arlene, who taught him of love’s mystery as she lay dying in a hospital while he worked nearby on the atomic bomb at Los Alamos. Feynman also discusses the investigation of the 1986 explosion of the Challenger space shuttle and his experiment that revealed the disaster’s cause.AUDIOBOOK 'Surely You're Joking Mr.

By Richard P. Feynman, Ralph Leighton, Edward Hutchings, Raymond Todd Publisher: Blackstone Audiobooks; Unabridged edition (June 2002) ISBN-10: MP3 128 kbps 327 Mb eBook version (PDF) also included A series of anecdotes shouldn't by rights add up to an autobiography, but that's just one of the many pieces of received wisdom that Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman (1918-88) cheerfully ignores in his engagingly eccentric book, a bestseller ever since its initial publication in 1985. Fiercely independent (read the chapter entitled 'Judging Books by Their Covers'), intolerant of stupidity even when it comes packaged as high intellectualism (check out 'Is Electricity Fire?' ), unafraid to offend (see 'You Just Ask Them?' ), Feynman informs by entertaining.